Explain Augustine’s temporal paradox

Augustines laic puzzle can be explained by starting temperh our typical beliefs about clipping, to wit the last(prenominal) does non pull by means of, the succeeding(a) is in time to exist and only the nowadays authorized exists. However the bendual existence of the inaugurate has no continuation because it immediately becomes the past tense or the future the moment we hand over to isolate it. In the words of St. Augustine, The pose hath no lay. The temporal paradox refers to the existence only of the present which flush does not have a duration.Following this temporal paradox and Augustine treated time in ontological terms, i.e. in relation back to the nature of organism and existence. We derive the tone of time by perceiving something that has passed, something that exists and something that bequeath exist in the future. Time is embodied and manifested by means of the duration of things that come into being to the present that passed away in an incessant c ontinuum of past and future. Consequently, material things move from none existence to existence to non existence (past, present and future).The lengthiness of the time continuum entails that the attend expects, and attends, and remembers, so that what it expects passes by way of what it attends to into what it remembers. (Augustine, 2002, p236) What the mind expects is the future, what is remembers is the past and what it attends to at the moment is the present, which is what exists. Attending to the present does not refer to our location or inhabitance in this time continuum and ones capturing of the immediate past in the memory. This is on the nose because the present has no duration or no space and it is only by dint of memory that we can attend to it.For St. Augustine, even time is created by matinee idol and indeed he is beyond the continuum of the time series to which volume and either former(a) things be bound. God is in a render of Eternal Now, where the presen t, past and future are at on the whole once. However, time St. Augustines humor of time is actually revolutionary, it nevertheless has critical repercussions that run spotty which Christian principles which he originally valued to justify and defend.With the past and future all happening in the present for God, tribe therefore are already predestine to what will happen to them. People were not real(a)ly given the gift of weft or freewill but are doomed to end up to how God have designed their world. What seemed to be a series of choices for people in this space of time is actually a absolute or done design for God. (Von Martelsand Schmidt, V, 2003, p79-102)2-Imagine that Russell and Berkeley are sitting across from each other at display panel. Write a unmindful dialogue (about 500 words) that captures each philosophers views with respect to the ontological status of the hedge. Be sure to bring out areas of arrangement and disagreementIn order to appreciate Bishop Ber keley, one moldiness rootage fully understand that ontology focuses on the nature of essence and meaning of being. Berkeley is a major proponent of subjective noble-mindedness in which ultimately argues that the world including all the material objects are not real but are mere collections of perceptual experiences of homosexual experience, which is what is real. It highlights that significance of mind before egress and the preordained connection of mind and body.Thinking is function that people constantly do, consciously, unconsciously or subconsciously in relating to their environment. The mind is essential to be considered in understanding the nature of the foundation because everything entailed the consciousness of the mind. Thus, the universe is the product of the mind. (Bourgeois, 2003, 162-163)Berkeley will not deny that the carry over being observed is definitely real but it needs to be subjected to ones consciousness before we subsist it is real. Moreover, the real essence of the send back or that which makes a table what it is resides in the idea of the table which is in the mind of God. It does not comfort on the physical table which we sensed because our experiences of the table vary. While we see the table is brown, solid and smooth, our experience of the brownness, solid state or smoothness of the table differs. There is a disparity between what at we encompass and what is real.Russell agrees with Berkeleys idea that the act of perception is dependent on the mind but the mind is only the psychological functioning of the brain hence, the perceptions therefore do not actually exist in the mind. We only get to have a mental idea of what a table is through our perception of the physical table. cognition is the prime source of familiarity (Engel, S., 2001, p 250-260).Knowledge is mainly based on the acquisition, interpretation, woof and organization of information what we perceive. In Bertrand Russells own words, our ideas are derived from two sources, sensation, and perception of the operation of our own mind, which may be called internal sense. (Russell, 2004, p556) Hence, we form our idea of table from the perception.This approximation of what reality through our senses, despite differences in the intensity of what brownness, solidness and smoothness of the table is real knowledge we can establish by poster and generalization. Incidentally, this is the underlying philosophy of science. In the end, we tally our knowledge about the table not from an innate idea of a table but through an observation of the table.We know that a table is brown, solid and smooth, ir careless(predicate) of the intensity of these descriptions from different people. Perception is the first step and degree towards knowledge and the portal of all the materials in it. (Russel, 2004, p556) And that is what is real regardless of the ideal table that we can conceive.ReferencesAugustine and Outler, A. (2002). The Confessions of St. August ine. Translated by Albert Cook Outler. Courier Dover PublicationsBourgeois, W. (2003). Persons What Philosophers judge about You. 2nd edition. Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.Engel, S. (2001). The Study of Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield,Russell, B. (2004). autobiography of Western Philosophy. 2nd edition. RoutledgeVon Martels, Z. R. W. M. and Schmidt, VM. Antiquity re-create Late Classical and Early new Themes. PREDESTINATION AND THE LOSS OF DRAMA FROM AUGUSTINE TO CALVIN by MB Pranger. Peeters Publishers